Linguistic Labor: Production of Aesthetic and Financial Value

Authors

  • Stevan Bradić Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/kis.2020.52.170.8

Keywords:

language, labor, value, capital, subsumption, surplus, form

Abstract

This essay analyzes how the process of financial quantification of linguistic labor affected the development of the social form of literature in capitalist societies. My methodological framework is cultural materialism, through which the classical communication model of literature is reinterpreted in accordance with the objective relations which make it possible. It proceeds from the intersection of language and money as universal equivalents, the emergence of linguistic labor power, through the commodification of language, formation of use and exchange values in the said context, and the formation of literary discourse. Along these lines, I attempt to show how the modern understanding of literature emerges at the beginning of the 19th century opposing the institutions of private linguistic property, as a specific form of labor which is not labor, which thus cannot be subsumed under capital, and whose concrete articulation aims to have a universal reach, in spite of the fact that its products necessarily become commodities in order to reach the public. Literature, therefore, up until the middle of the 20th century, understands itself as a strategy of resistance to the capitalist mode of production that simultaneously cannot sustain itself without its institutional mediation. Finally, this essay aims to show how the given process was crucial in the articulation of linguistic forms of modern literature, as well as the autonomous norms for its evaluation, which we know by the name of aesthetic value.

References

Anderson, Benedikt. Nacija: zamišljena zajednica, prevele Nata Čengić i Nataša Pavlović, Beograd: Plato, 1998.
Badju, Alen. Manifest afirmacionizma, preveo Stevan Bradić, Zlatna greda, god. 12, br. 127/128 (maj-jun 2012), 17-21.
Bagdikian, Ben. The New Media Monopoly: A Completely Revised and Updated Edition, Boston: Beacon Press, 2004.
Beech, Dave. Art and Value: Art's Economic Exceptionalism in Classical, Neoclassical and Marxist Economics, Boston: Brill, 2015. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004288157" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Crossreff</a>
Beecroft, Alexander. An Ecology of World Literature, New York: Verso, 2015. elektronsko izdanje, bez paginacije.
Benjamin, Walter. Eseji, preveo Milan Tabaković, Beograd: Nolit, 1974.
Birger, Peter. "Avangarda i neoavangarda: pokušaj odgovora na određene kritike povodom Teorije avangarde", preveo Stevan Bradić, Zlatna greda, god. 14, br. 151/152 (maj-jun 2014), 4-12.
Birger, Peter. Teorija avangarde, preveo Zoran Milutinović, Beograd: Narodna knjiga-Alfa, 1998.
Bradić, Stevan "Nemi govor i opasnost pisanja: Ransijerovo razumevanje književnosti", Letopis Matice srpske, knjiga 495, sveska 3, mart 2015, str. 299-320.
Braun, Nikolas. "Umetničko delo u doba njegove realne supsumacije pod kapital", preveo Stevan Bradić, Letopis Matice srpske, god.190, knj. 494, sv. 4, 2014, 480-501.
Burdije, Pjer. Pravila umetnosti: geneza i struktura polja književnosti; preveli Vladimir Kapor i dr., Novi Sad: Svetovi, 2003.
Cooper, John Xiros. Modernism and the Culture of Market Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511485374" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Crossreff</a>
Coward, David. A History of French Literature, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.
Duncan, Bruce. Goethe's Werther and the Critics, New York: Camden House, 2005.
Fuko, Mišel. "Šta je autor?", prevela Eleonora Prohić, Polja, god. 57, br. 473 (jan-feb. 2012), 100-112.
Fuko, Mišel. Poredak diskursa, prevod Dejan Aničić, Loznica: Karpos, 2007.
Fuko, Mišel. Riječi i stvari: arheologija humanističkih znanosti, preveo Srđan Rahelić, Beograd: Nolit, 1971.
Hegel, G.V.F. Estetika I-III, preveo Nikola Popović, Beograd: Kultura, 1970.
Hegel, G.V.F. Nauka logike I, preveo Nikola Popović,Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko-grafički zavod, 1976.
Heinrich, Michael. Uvod u Marxovu kritiku političke ekonomije, Zagreb: CRS, 2015.
Kant, Imanuel. Kritika moći suđenja, preveo Nikola M. Popović, Beograd: Kultura 1975.
Kejmer, Tomas. Robinson Kruso između religije i politike, preveo Stevan Bradić, Rizom.rs, 19. 02. 2017. bez paginacije, Web. <http://rizom.rs/2017/02/19/robinzon-kruso-izmedu-religije-politike-tomas-kejmer/> 10. 4. 2018.
Marks, Karl. Kapital: kritika političke ekonomije. 1-3, preveli Moša Pijade, Rodoljub Čolaković, Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko-grafički zavod, 1971.
Marks, Karl. Teorije o višku vrednosti (četvrti tom Kapitala). Deo 1, prevod Mara Fran, Beograd: Prosveta, 1969.
Rancière, Jacques. Disagreement: politics and philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Rancière, Jacques. Mute speech, New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
Rancière, Jacques. The politics of aesthetics: the distribution of the sensible, London: Continuum, 2004.
Ransijer, Žak. "Politika književnosti", Politika književnosti, preveli Marko Drča i dr., Novi Sad: Adresa, 2008, 7-35.
Ransijer, Žak. "Sudbina ne postoji", razgovor vodio Stevan Bradić, Letopis Matice srpske, knj. 495, sveska 3, mart, 2015, 250-259.
Rosi-Landi, Feručo.Jezik kao rad i kao tržište, Beograd: Rad, 1981.
Šiler, Fridrih. "O estetskom vaspitanju čoveka u nizu pisama", Pozniji filozofsko-estetički spisi, prevela Olga Kostrešević, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, 2008. 180-260.
Šiler, Fridrih. O lepom, prevod Strahinja Kostić, Beograd: Kultura, 1967.
Šiner, Lari. Otkrivanje umetnosti: kulturna istorija, prevod Nataša Vavan Pralica, Ljiljana Petrović, Novi Sad: Adresa, 2007.
Zhilyaev, Arseny. "Tracing Avant-Garde Museology", E-Flux, Journal #82, May 2017, bez paginacije, Web. <http://www.e-flux.com/journal/82/128815/tracing-avant-garde-museology/>

Published

2020-10-28

Issue

Section

Contexts

How to Cite

Linguistic Labor: Production of Aesthetic and Financial Value. (2020). Literary History — Journal of Literary Studies, 52(170), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.18485/kis.2020.52.170.8