Voice and Community: An Interpretation of Kafka’s Short Story “Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse Folk”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/kis.2024.56.184.7Keywords:
Franz Kafka, zoopoetics, art, Erasmus of Rotterdam, irony, crowdAbstract
This paper examines the meanings and formal techniques in Kafka’s final short story, Josephine the Singer, or the Mouse Folk. The study first outlines the key features of the narrative instance in correspondence with crucial interpretations of Kafka’s zoopoetics (Benjamin, Deleuze) and in relation to Derridean concepts of the animal. Additionally, it presents the fundamental principles of the discourse produced by this narrative instance. Particular attention is given to the frequent self-corrective tendencies in expression and to the heterogeneous nature of the narrator, metaphorically speaking, in terms of the interplay between human and animal nature.
The analysis then moves toward examining the characteristics of the community that contextualizes Josephine’s performances, followed by the relationship between this community and Josephine herself, and finally, the attitude of the mouse folk toward Josephine’s whistling/singing. In addition to identifying the traits of the crowd, which emerges as a form of communality in contrast to Josephine, the study highlights certain features that exclude the mouse folk from the course of history: their lack of interest in communal memory and the absence of a progressive-rationalist consciousness. Ultimately, the community’s reductive understanding and ambivalent evaluation of Josephine’s performances – marked by enthusiasm in reception yet a lack of recognition – largely stem from the scarcity of symbolic practices among the mouse folk, who are ironically referred to as a „people“.
The following section of the paper establishes analogies between the mode of expression in Josephine the Singer and the narrative style of Tristram Shandy, as well as the discourse in Erasmus of Rotterdam’s In Praise of Folly. The narrator’s elusive meaning in Kafka’s text is thus paralleled with narrators who have not yet fully internalized a clear, anthropocentric division between the human and the non-human. Ultimately, the paper argues that the meanings of Kafka’s testamentary story open up toward a transformation of communal forms – moving from minimal symbolic practices of reality representation toward more complex civilizational modes of communal organization. In other words, Josephine the Singer evokes a process that precedes the clear separation between the human and the animal, a separation that underlies the logocentric, meaning-generating tradition of Western thought.
References
Anders, Ginter. Kafka – za i protiv. Preveo Ivan Foht. Novi Sad: Kiša, 2015.
Benjamin, Walter. Franz Kafka. On the Tenth Anniversary of His Death. Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books. 2007, 111–140.
Delez, Žil, Gatari, Feliks. Kafka. Prevela Slavica Miletić. Novi Sad, Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, 1998.
Derrida, Jacques. The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow). Critical Inquiry. 28. 2. 2002, 369–418.
Dolar, Mladen. Glas i ništa više. Prevela Iva Nenić. Beograd: Portal, 2012.
Driscoll, Kari, Hoffmann, Eva. Introduction: What is Zoopoetics? What is Zoopetics?: Texts, Bodies, Entanglement. Edited by Kari Driscoll, Eva Hoffmann. Cham: Springer. 2018, 1–13.
Ehlert, Klaus. Literature in Weimar Republic. A History of German Literature. London, New York: Routledge. 1993, 373–415. Gadamer, Hans Georg. Istina i metoda. Prevod Slobodan Novakov. Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša. 1978.
Ford, Thomas. „Crowds, Animality, and Aesthetic Language in Kafka’s ’Josephine’“. Kafka’s Creatures. Edited by Marc Lucht, Donna Yarri. Plymouth: Lexington Books. 2010, 119–135.
Fort Jeff. The Imperative to Write. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.
Harel, Naama. Kafka’s Zoopoetics: Beyond the Human-Animal Barrier. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2020.
Hojzinga, Johan. Erazmo. Prevela Olga Kostrešević. Beograd: Nolit, 1980.
Kafka, Franc. „Pevačica Jozefina ili narod miševa“. Presuda: sabrane pripovetke. Preveo Branimir Živojinović. Beograd: Laguna. 2013, 502–521.
Norris, Margot. Kafka’s ’Josefine’: The Animal as the Negative Site of Narration. Beasts of the Modern Imagination: Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, Ernst, and Lawrence. Baltimore: Johns University Press. 2019, 118–133.
Pantović, Katarina. Aktuelna čitanja Kafkinog dela. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2023.
Petrović, Vuk. Poetika humora kod Kafke. Prva sveska. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević, 2022.
Petrović, Vuk. Uvod u proučavanje humora kod Kafke. Književna istorija. 45 (2013) 149, 95–119.
Platon. Država. Prevod Albin Vilhar, Branko Pavlović. Beograd: Bigz, 2002.
Robertson, Ritchie. From Naturalism to National Socialism (1890–1945). The Cambridge History of German Literature. Edited by Helen Watanabe-O’Kelly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997, 327–392.
Roterdamski, Erazmo. Pohvala ludosti. Prevela Darinka Nevenić-Grabovac. Beograd: Rad, 1976.
Stojanović Dragan. Ironija i značenje. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published articles online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website, social networks like ResearchGate or Academia), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


